The Ukrainian company responsible for roughly 60% of Kyiv's strikes deep inside Russia is now pointing its engineering muscle in the opposite direction: at incoming ballistic missiles. Fire Point, the maker of the FP-1 and FP-2 long-range strike drones and the FP-5 Flamingo cruise missile, is developing a ground-based interceptor system called Freyja, built around a new missile designated the FP-7.X. The move, detailed in a wave of late-June reporting led by a June 25 Defense News investigation, reframes one of the war's most prolific offensive suppliers as a candidate provider of European air and missile defense.

The pitch is built on a single, blunt number. Fire Point is targeting a cost of under $1 million per interceptor — roughly $700,000 in practice — against the approximately $3.8 million price tag of a Patriot PAC-3 round. In a war defined by the economics of attrition, where the side that can trade cheaply for expensive threats tends to win the exchange, that gap is the entire argument.

From the launch pad to the kill chain

Fire Point is not a defensive company by background. It holds more than $1 billion in Ukrainian government contracts this year, and its hardware is doing the heavy lifting of Ukraine's deep-strike campaign. Per Defense News, the firm accounts for about 60% of all Ukrainian strikes inside Russia.

The offensive catalog is substantial. Fire Point manufactures the FP-1 deep-strike drone, the FP-2, and — at the top of the range — the FP-5 Flamingo cruise missile, which Janes reports has a range of up to 3,000 km, a warhead exceeding 1,000 kg, and electronic-warfare-resistant guidance.

Crucially, the new interceptor is not a clean-sheet design. The FP-7.X is a derivative of the FP-7 ballistic missile, which Janes has covered Fire Point testing, with a reported range of around 200 km. In other words, the company is repurposing an offensive ballistic-missile program into a defensive one — taking a weapon it already knows how to build and turning it around to hunt other missiles.

What Freyja actually is

Freyja is best understood not as a single missile but as a system stitched together from a deliberately international parts bin, with the integration done in Ukraine. According to Militarnyi, the FP-7.X interceptor flies at 1,500 to 2,000 meters per second and uses an imaging infrared seeker, with the company also evaluating a semi-active seeker from Germany's Diehl. The interceptor is designed to engage targets at an altitude of roughly 24 km — about 15 miles.

The supporting architecture reads like a survey of NATO's air-defense supply chain. Freyja is built to integrate the Link-16 NATO data protocol and a Kongsberg fire-distribution command center. For its eyes, the system can draw on multiple radar options: the SAAB Giraffe 8A/4A, the Thales Ground Master 400, and Germany's Hensoldt TRML-4D.

That last sensor is the one with a signed deal behind it. On June 16, 2026, Fire Point and Hensoldt signed a strategic partnership to integrate the TRML-4D radar into Freyja, Militarnyi reports. The TRML-4D is not a paper choice — it already supports Ukraine's roughly 10 IRIS-T SLM batteries, meaning the radar is a known, fielded quantity inside the country's existing air-defense network. Beyond Hensoldt, Defense News notes that Fire Point is in talks with Thales, Leonardo, and Kongsberg, even as the company stresses that nearly all components are produced in Ukraine.

The timeline and the production math

Fire Point is moving on an aggressive schedule. The company is targeting its first operational interception by the end of 2027, and aims to begin production at a rate of three units per day starting in August. Co-founder and chief designer Denys Shtilerman is the named technical voice behind the program in the Defense News account.

It is worth being precise about what is and isn't proven here. An end-of-2027 first intercept is a goal, not a demonstrated capability, and intercepting a ballistic target at 24 km altitude with an infrared-homing interceptor is a genuinely hard engineering problem distinct from launching strike drones. The FP-7 ballistic missile from which the interceptor derives has been tested; the defensive variant's performance against a maneuvering or high-speed threat remains to be shown.

Why a strike-drone firm, and why now?

The strategic logic runs through Europe as much as through Ukraine. The Defense Post, in a June 22 piece, frames the Ukraine-Germany cooperation as groundwork for a pan-European ballistic-missile shield, positioning Fire Point's low-cost interceptor as a building block that legacy systems can't match on price. The affordability case — hundreds of thousands of dollars per shot rather than millions — is the same one that makes the program attractive whether the threat is over Kharkiv or over a NATO capital.

For Ukraine, the symbolism is its own story: a country that has spent the war as a consumer of Western air defense is now angling to export it. That repositioning, from arms buyer to security provider, is the throughline connecting the German radar deal, the NATO-protocol integration, and the talks with multiple European primes.

One caveat belongs in the same frame as the ambition. Defense News notes that Fire Point is under investigation by Ukraine's National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU); no charges have been filed. For a firm holding more than $1 billion in state contracts and now courting European defense partnerships, that scrutiny is part of the operating context.

Why It Matters

Modern air and missile defense has an arithmetic problem: defenders routinely spend millions to shoot down threats that cost the attacker a fraction of that. A credible interceptor in the $700,000 range — built from a proven ballistic-missile airframe, fed by an already-fielded NATO radar, and produced at multiple units per day — attacks that imbalance directly. If Fire Point hits even part of its targets, the implication extends well past Ukraine: Europe gains a domestically integrated, affordable layer for ballistic-missile defense, and a wartime strike supplier becomes a peacetime security exporter. The unknowns are equally large. The end-of-2027 intercept is unproven, the seeker choice is still open, and the company's NABU investigation hangs over its commercial credibility. The signed Hensoldt partnership and the named European negotiating partners are the concrete signals worth tracking; the rest is, for now, an engineering promise.

Sources