El Obeid, the capital of Sudan's North Kordofan state, went dark last month. Not metaphorically — literally. A drone strike on the city's main power transformer knocked out electricity across a metropolitan area of more than half a million people, one of at least 15 documented drone attacks that hit the city and its surrounding areas over a three-week stretch in June, according to the United Nations human rights office. The strikes killed at least 45 civilians and marked what the UN now calls a "relentless" campaign against the city.

The scale of the June bombardment stands out even against more than three years of escalating conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which began in April 2023. UN rights chief Volker Türk described the pattern as a systematic campaign against the machinery that keeps a city alive: markets, schools, fuel stations, water infrastructure, civilian vehicles and, finally, the power grid itself. The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) has separately characterized the broader war as having become a "drone-dominated conflict" — a "relentless race" between SAF and RSF marked by shifting technologies and even direct "drone-on-drone combat," according to Al Jazeera's reporting of the group's assessment.

A City Under Siege From the Air

El Obeid has become a magnet for displacement as fighting elsewhere in Sudan has intensified. UN reporting puts the city's population at more than 500,000 residents, swelled by upwards of 100,000 internally displaced people, many of whom fled the siege of El Fasher in North Darfur. That makes the city both a humanitarian lifeline and, apparently, a target: RSF drones have repeatedly struck the civilian infrastructure that displaced families depend on most directly — water points, fuel supplies, and now the electrical grid that powers hospitals. Türk has described residents' desperation directly, saying some people are selling their belongings just to finance their escape from the city, as the UN separately reports more than 13 million people displaced nationwide and forced-displacement incidents in Sudan climbing at a rate of roughly one every two to three days.

Sudan Tribune, a local outlet, reported that the continued strikes have disabled not just the power grid but hospital operations in El Obeid, corroborating the UN's account of infrastructure being deliberately targeted rather than struck incidentally. When a transformer serving a city of half a million goes down, the blackout doesn't stay contained to street lighting — it cascades into water pumping stations, medical refrigeration, and communications, compounding the humanitarian emergency for a population that is already disproportionately displaced and vulnerable.

Humanitarian workers on the ground describe the same siege dynamic from a different angle. Islamic Relief, in a July 2, 2026 dispatch published via the UN's ReliefWeb platform, reported that daily drone strikes on aid trucks trying to bring in fuel, food and other supplies had placed El Obeid under partial siege, with vital supplies set to run out within weeks, and put the city's population at nearly 600,000 — more than 105,000 of them displaced people who had already fled violence elsewhere. RSF troops had almost fully encircled the city, the group said, leaving the UN warning of a looming large-scale assault and a possible repeat of the mass-casualty siege of El Fasher.

How This Fits the Broader 2026 Pattern

El Obeid's June ordeal did not emerge in isolation. In March, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) issued a briefing note warning of a "sharp increase" in Sudanese civilian deaths tied to growing drone warfare by both sides in the conflict — SAF and RSF alike. The briefing documented more than 500 civilians killed in drone strikes between January 1 and March 15, including over 277 killed in the first two weeks of March alone, more than three-quarters of them in drone strikes. On March 20, the first day of Eid al-Fitr, air and drone strikes hit El Daein Teaching Hospital in East Darfur, killing at least 64 people, including seven women and 13 children; a day later, a drone strike on a commercial transport convoy in the same city killed 23 more. That same week, a drone strike on an electricity substation in Ad Dabbah, in Northern state, killed six people and cut power to the entire locality — a preview of the tactic later repeated at much larger scale in El Obeid. That briefing established the baseline pattern that has since intensified: strikes on markets, on infrastructure, on the civilian spaces that keep cities functioning, rather than strictly on military positions.

By mid-June, the toll had become national in scale. Al Jazeera, citing UN figures, reported that drone warfare had killed more than 1,000 civilians across Sudan in just the first five months of 2026, against a backdrop of more than 13.6 million people displaced nationwide and more than 20 million people in need of health assistance. Türk has directly attributed the surge to what he describes as a sharp increase in drone-warfare use by both warring parties — a shift from earlier phases of the conflict, in which artillery and ground assaults dominated the casualty toll, toward standoff strikes that can reach deep into cities without exposing an attacking force to return fire. "Autonomous weapons cannot become a license for atrocity crimes," Türk has warned.

Why the Numbers Matter

ACLED's own characterization of the war — a "drone-dominated conflict" marked by a "relentless race" and, per Al Jazeera's reporting, even direct "drone-on-drone combat" between SAF and RSF — is a useful frame for reading what happened in El Obeid. Drone strikes are not a supplementary tactic bolted onto a conventional siege; the shift toward drones as a primary means of projecting force is itself the story. Fifteen documented strikes hitting one city over a three-week window, killing 45 people and knocking out a transformer that serves half a million residents, is what that shift looks like in practice: multiple strikes in rapid succession against a rotating list of civilian and infrastructure targets, rather than a single high-value strike tied to one military objective.

That tempo is itself a signal about capability. Sustaining more than a dozen distinct strike events in less than a month against one metro area implies a level of drone availability, targeting cadence, and operational tolerance for civilian harm that goes well beyond a handful of high-value precision strikes. It points to the RSF treating low-cost drones as an attritional tool for degrading a city's ability to function — a tactic that doesn't require air superiority in the conventional sense, just enough small platforms and enough disregard for the distinction between military and civilian infrastructure.

Why It Matters

Sudan's civil war has, for more than three years, been described largely in terms of ground offensives, sieges, and famine conditions in besieged cities like El Fasher. The El Obeid data reframes that picture: cheap, widely available drone technology is now a primary instrument for degrading civilian infrastructure at scale, not a supplementary tactic bolted onto conventional siege warfare. When a power transformer serving half a million people can be knocked out by a single strike, and when that strike is one of at least 15 documented in a single three-week stretch, drones have moved from a battlefield curiosity to a dominant means by which one side is projecting force into cities it does not control on the ground.

That has direct policy stakes for the international bodies, arms-control frameworks, and regional governments now grappling with unregulated drone proliferation in civil conflicts. Sudan offers a stark test case: neither SAF nor RSF operates anything resembling a conventional air force, yet both have been able to sustain repeated strikes on cities hundreds of kilometers from front lines. ACLED's own "drone-dominated conflict" framing is itself a policy signal — an attempt to establish drone-strike tempo, not just casualty counts, as a metric worth tracking and constraining, in the same way displacement figures have long anchored humanitarian appeals. Absent an accountability mechanism specific to low-cost armed drones — export controls, battlefield-attribution efforts, or a targeting-law enforcement push — the El Obeid pattern is likely to recur wherever an armed faction gains access to a modest drone inventory and a city it wants to punish rather than capture.

Sources