Ukraine's Cabinet of Ministers approved a new legal mechanism on July 1 that, for the first time, gives foreign governments a formal, repeatable process for buying weapons and defense technologies directly from Ukrainian manufacturers. The move converts an informal wartime arrangement — allied nations quietly acquiring battle-tested Ukrainian drone tech — into a structured export system with published rules, processing timelines, and revenue-sharing terms.

The mechanism is built on top of the "Drone Deal" framework, the arrangement under which 27 partner countries — 15 NATO members and 12 non-NATO states — already have agreements in place with Kyiv. Under the new rules, any of those 27 nations can now apply to purchase unmanned aerial vehicles and related technology straight from Ukrainian producers, including companies like Phantom Defence, rather than routing requests through slower, ad hoc government-to-government channels.

Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, who announced the approval, described it as filling a gap that has existed throughout the war: "The government has approved the first transparent mechanism for exporting Ukrainian weapons," he said, adding that it establishes a "clear procedure" for both domestic manufacturers and Western partners to follow. Prime Minister Yuliya Svyrydenko and President Volodymyr Zelensky were both named in connection with the approval, underscoring the political weight Kyiv is putting behind the initiative.

How the Mechanism Works

The mechanics are more bureaucratic than dramatic, but they matter. According to Ukraine's state news agency Ukrinform, only countries that already hold intergovernmental agreements under the Drone Deal umbrella are eligible — this is not an open marketplace for any interested buyer. Once a partner nation submits an export application, Ukrainian authorities are required to process it within 30 days.

There's a floor on deal size: the minimum contract value is set at UAH 15 million, or roughly $335,000, filtering out small or informal purchases and pointing the system toward institutional buyers — allied defense ministries and their prime contractors — rather than individual end users.

Kyiv has also built in several layers of control that keep the government firmly in the loop even after a sale is approved:

  • A critical-products carve-out. The Defence Ministry maintains a list of "critical products" that are excluded from export entirely, regardless of buyer. Neither Jane's nor other reporting has published the specific contents of that list, but its existence signals that Ukraine's most sensitive or strategically important systems will stay off the market.
  • Military needs come first. Ukrainian armed forces' own procurement requirements are prioritized over export permissions — manufacturers must be able to guarantee they can simultaneously fulfill government contracts and export orders, and Fedorov has said permission can be denied if the state still needs the equipment.
  • No intellectual property alienation. Per FlightGlobal's and Ukrinform's reporting, transfers under the mechanism do not include a transfer of underlying IP rights — buyers get the hardware and associated technology, not ownership of Ukrainian design know-how.
  • Re-export requires written consent. If a partner country wants to pass Ukrainian-origin technology on to a third country, it needs Kyiv's explicit written sign-off first.
  • A 20% cut on re-exports. Should that re-export happen, 20% of the value of the re-exported product flows back into Ukraine's state budget.

The Industrial Base Behind the Policy

The export mechanism isn't happening in a vacuum — it's an attempt to formalize what has become one of the more remarkable industrial stories of the war. Euronews reports that Ukraine now has roughly 800 arms producers operating and is turning out more than 4 million drones a year, a figure Kyiv says it could double with sufficient funding. That scale, built under wartime pressure and combat iteration, has turned Ukrainian UAV manufacturers into some of the most operationally proven suppliers in the world — companies whose products have been shaped by direct exposure to modern electronic warfare and front-line conditions that few other defense industrial bases can replicate.

Until now, allied nations wanting access to that expertise had to work through informal channels, bilateral asks, or slower state-to-state defense cooperation processes. The new mechanism gives that demand an actual front door — with a clock on it.

Why It Matters

For the 27 Drone Deal partner nations, this converts Ukraine's wartime drone-manufacturing surge from an informal, case-by-case cooperation arrangement into a standing, rules-based export product they can budget and plan against — a 30-day processing window and a defined minimum contract size are exactly the kind of predictability defense-procurement offices need to write requirements around.

For Ukraine, the calculus is different but no less strategic. Formalizing exports gives Kyiv a new, non-aid revenue stream from an industry it built almost entirely under fire — and the 20% re-export levy plus retained veto over "critical products" ensure that revenue and control stay with Ukraine even as its technology spreads to third markets. It also positions Ukrainian manufacturers, who have iterated faster on drone countermeasures and swarm tactics than almost anyone else over the past several years, as standing suppliers to NATO and partner militaries rather than one-off wartime vendors.

The mechanism also functions as an implicit signal about where Ukraine sees its defense-industrial future heading: not toward wind-down after the war ends, but toward becoming a durable exporter whose products are already combat-validated. Whether the 30-day processing promise holds up in practice, and what ends up on the "critical products" exclusion list, will determine how much of that ambition becomes reality versus policy statement.

Sources